In case you are unfamiliar with the new Russian politician here is an article about here

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1161977/Putins-poster-girl-Pin-politician-hates-West–loves-Thatcher.html

Earlier protest 10 years ago, so why so many protesters carry Anti Obama and anti Pelosi, Socialism posters,

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1213056/Up-million-march-US-Capitol-protest-Obamas-spending-tea-party-demonstration.html#ixzz0R7RHW4Iz

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20091217/tod-church-poster-of-mary-and-joseph-in-8dcf68a.html
Is it really so offensive that it doesn’t fall under free speech and needs to be brown painted to protect the sensibilities of the populace?

to the news OTHER than what’s going on in Egypt? For example, how many of you know that Wikileaks released documents yesterday that divulged that Obama gave the Trident misslile codes of the UK’s defensive misslie arsenal to the Russians? This was AFTER the UK demanded that the Russians NOT know this information. Does Obama fancy himself the leader of the world now? Who are this man’s allegiances to?
edit: "missile"
For you idiots who need it spelled out: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8304654/WikiLeaks-cables-US-agrees-to-tell-Russia-Britains-nuclear-secrets.html#

In the Welsh town of Merthyr Tydfil a billboard has been erected by Peta that states "Making kids eat meat is child abuse"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-13000663

What’s your opinion on these kinds of posters?

Here is a link to the BBC reports and video of the second soldier:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6509813.stm

I see these unfortunate soldiers in the pictures and video and they do not appear to be coerced or beaten as has been suggested by posters in Yahoo Answers. There does seem to be problems in translations from Farsi language to English as well as some bad editing on the video.

To me the soldiers look very confused by it all and are hoping this situation will meet with a diplomatic resoloution soon. They do not appear to be abused at all by the Iranians, and the broadcasts are for Iranian television and probably to calm the fears for Iranian citizens.

I think it would be best not to get all inflamed about this. Obviously the reactions intend to whip up anger and fury, which always causes a problem.

So far Iran just wants a promise that this will not happen again and wants a trial. I say let them have thier process and see what happens- then respond accordingly.
We have no enlightened leaders in the world right now- and clearly there is much deception from all world leaders- so to take such a hateful angry stance on this issue- I think is very irresponsible. Iran is not a threat unless they ally with a nuclear enemy. If they wanted to engage they would do far more that holding a few hostages. They are trying to provoke an agressive response- that we should not fall for. It is difficult to believe anyone these days- but I do know by their eyes that the soldiers are not afraid. They do not agree with what they are being asked to say. That much is obvious, but they are not in any danger if we respond properly.

It is England’s fault for being in the wrong place at the wrong time- As if we didn’t expect them to do something like this- given history. Oh, and we have broken the geneva convention and many treaties as well. No one can point a finger at anyone right now. We should just fix our own country and stay out of matters not of our making!
Just so that everybody knows- I am not some bleeding heart liberal hippie. I am a realist. We are not wanted in the middle east. Truthfully we shouldn’t even be there- and this is their waying of saying just that.

I wonder how kind we would be to Iranian soldiers in Gitmo?

Should they have just fired a shot and turned them around? Yes, that would be the action I would take. But serving in the middle east right now means this is a possibility for any soldier so the fact that this happened is not the fault of the Iranians- it is OUR responsibility to protect our soldiers- especially when we know what the Iranians are capable of.

That’s all I am saying.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1204213/Spoof-poster-Obamas-face-painted-The-Joker-branded-dangerous-mean-spirited.html

They had no problem comparing Bush to Hitler.

How many more indignities at their hands must we suffer, in the name of tolerance?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1340794/Christmas-evil-Muslim-group-launch-poster-campaign-festive-period.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11300552

This seems pretty immature to me. Why can’t they just let the pope do his thing? Why do they feel they need to defy the advertising standards agency’s rules and put up these posters that mock the pope, the catholic faith and it’s followers? The advertising standard agency has it’s rules for a reason.

To add insult to injury, they are using the whole thing to advertise their ice cream.

Please give me sensible answers, no asinine answers like "Well religion is stupid anyway". I’m an agnostic and pretty apathetic about the pope’s visit, so please don’t attack me either.
I agree with free speech and that it is silly that the pope’s visit is funded by government money, but I think it is ridiculous and suggestion of how rotten parts of our society are that it is OK to mock so many people just to sell ice cream. There is no such thing as corporate ethics. Free speech is exploited.

Apparently, a black couple was digitally removed.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1227868/Race-row-black-stars-airbrushed-Couples-Retreat-film-poster.html#ixzz0Wt2j6Llr